Interference No. 104,403 therebetween and another surface constituted by a plurality of conic sections (Rosenthal Record page 44). 9. The junior party has submitted the affidavit of Dr. Fredrick Lauter (Exhibit 2116, Rosenthal Record page 46) as corroboration of the August 1992 reduction to practice. 10. Lauter testifies that he met with Rosenthal on August 14, 1992 and was shown: . . . a lens sheet in which I, the viewer could see the sheet appear as an opaque image material at one angle of view and then from another angle of view, see the sheet as transparent, thereby providing a clear view through the sheet to objects behind it. This lens sheet had a plurality of parallel lenticulated conic lenses on the viewing side and on the opposite side had a plurality of spaced-apart, raised parallel portions with a composite image positioned thereupon with indented transparent concave lenses in between which permitted the passage of light. Thereby an object beneath the sheet at a preselected distance was viewable through the transparent concave lens portions. (Rosenthal Record page 46). 11. Lauter further testifies that Exhibit 2118 (Rosenthal Record page 47) is a photocopy of the lens prototype of the lens he saw in August 1992 (Rosenthal Record page 46). 12. Exhibit 2118 (Rosenthal Record page 47) depicts a lens having one surface constituted by a plurality of spaced-apart parallel sections with concave sections therebetween and another surface constituted by a plurality of conic sections. 13. Lauter also testifies that he was shown unique packaging with the lens sheet as a window which provided a view of an opaque image at one angle and then at 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007