CHEN et al. V. HESTER et al. - Page 5


                                 0                                                                   

            Interference No. 104,490                                                                 

                  In Interference Number 104,491 and captioned Hester et al.                         
            v. Bouchard et al., Hester et al. requested and agreed to adverse                        
            judgment against them under 37 C.F.R. § 1.662 (a). See Paper                             
            Number 67 filed on March 5, 2003, in Interference Number 104,491.                        
            On March 11, 2003, the Board entered judgment against Hester et                          
            al. in Interference Number 104,491 as to all their claims                                
            designated as corresponding to the counts. See Paper Number 69 in                        
            Interference 104,491. Hester et al. were involved in Interference                        
            Number 104,491 based on the same application as here, that is,                           

            Application Serial Number 08/454,210, and based on the identical                         
            claims as here. Thus, by conceding priority to Bouchard et al.,                          
            Hester et al. were no longer entitled to the claims in their                             

            application designated as corresponding to the counts which are                          
            the same claims on which Hester et al. are involved here.                                
            Therefore, Hester et al. have no enforceable claims remaining in                         
            their involved application in this interference proceeding.                              
            Accordingly, all Hester et al.'s preliminary motions are                                 
            DISMISSED.                                                                               

                  We have the extraordinary situation here where neither party                       
            in this interference has any enforceable claims remaining in                             

            their involved patent and application, respectively. Therefore,                          
            there is no longer any basis on which we could or shall continue                         
            this proceeding as the rights of the parties as to the subject                           
            matter of the counts has already been determined in the other,                           

            related proceedings. In light of these facts, it is now                                  
                                                  5                                                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007