Ex Parte MEGY - Page 13




                all the elements of the count (Kndl, 105 F.3d at 1449, 41 USPQ2d at 1689), not just the "essence"                                    
                of the invention.                                                                                                                    
                        The next document relied upon is said to be a more detailed disclosure which was submitted                                   
                to patent counsel for preparation of a patent application. The document is an attachment to Paper                                    
                53. The document bears the date of October 11, 1997. Dr. Heshmatpour testifies:                                                      
                                 Prior to October 16,1997, 1 wrote out my invention disclosure in more detail                                        
                                 (13 pages + 2 drawings) and sought the advice of new counsel in anticipation                                        
                                 of a dispute with Mr. Megy. A true and correct copy of this invention                                               
                                 disclosure is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit 21. 1 then met around                                           
                                 this time with Samuel Ragoncse, Esquire. Mr. Ragoncse referred me to a                                              
                                 paten t attorney, Allan N. Kutzenco, Esquire, at Connolly, Bove, Lodge &                                            
                                 Hutz LLP. I spoke to Mr. Kutzenco on the telephone around this time                                                 
                                 regarding my invention disclosure and met him in person at his office prior                                         
                                 to October 16,1997. During this meeting, I gave him my invention disclosure                                         
                                 and instructed him to prepare a patent application for filing in the United                                         
                                 States Patent and Trademark Office.                                                                                 
                Heshniatpour Declaration, p.7, 18.                                                                                                   
                        Again, Dr. Heshmatpour does not provide an explanation of how this document proves                                           
                conception of an embodiment meeting all the limitations of at least one of the alternatives of the                                   
                count. We have reviewed the document on our own. The document appears to us to describe a                                            
                method for making aluminum master alloys using gas injection, including master alloys to be used                                     
                for grain refining in the conventional manner. The disclosure does not appear to describe an in-situ                                 
                process for making a cast grain-refined aluminum alloy which is the subject matter of all the                                        
                alternatives of the count. The document is titled: "Process for Manufacturing High Potency-Ultra                                     
                Clean Aluminum Grain Refining and Specialty Master Alloys." In a section captioned "Summary                                          
                of the Invention," the document states:                                                                                              
                                          It is an object of the invention to provide improved grain refiners for                                    
                                 aluminum that can be used in processing of aluminum alloy castings which                                            
                                 would allow subsequent production of thin sheet, foil, fine wire and other                                          
                                 forms without concern for product degradation. Another object of the                                                


                        10 A redacted copy is also of record in the Heshmatpour involved application as Exhibit 21 to the Rule                       
                1.608(b) Evidentiary Declaration 1 of Bahrnan Heshmatpour (Application 09/020,616, Paper 7).                                         
                                                                      -13-                                                                           






Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007