DEEN et al. V. NI et al. - Page 7

                                 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, KEITH CHARLES DEEN, MARK R.                                                   

               HURLE, PETER YOUNG, and KONG B. TAN, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-3                                             

               and 5-18 of patent 6,013,476, which correspond to Count 1;                                                                         

                                 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties'                                            

               attention is directed to 35 USC § 135(c); and                                                                                      

                                 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be given a paper number and                                         

               be entered in the administrative records of Deen's 6,013,476 patent and Ni's 09/095,094                                            

               application.                                                                                                                       






                                          CAROL A. SPIZGEI!                                                                                       
                                          Administrative Patent Judge                                                                             



                                                                                                   BOARD OF PATENT                                
                                          SA11Y (AZDNER LANE APPEALS                                                                              
                                          Administrative Patent Judge AND                                                                         
                                                                                                     INTERFERENCES                                


                                          MICHAEL P. TIERNEY                                                                                      
                                          Administrative Patent Judge                                                                             










                                                                        7                                                                         








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007