ne opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 24
Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed:
Wasbington, D.C. 20231 22 January 2003
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
JOHN W. PARCE, ANNE R. KOPF-SILL FAXED
and LUC J. BOUSSE
Junior Party, 2 2 2UOýUj
(Patent 5,942,443),
p xy. & -t. 0 F F i C E
V.
BERNHARD WEIGL, PAUL YAGER,
JAMES BRODY and MARK HOLL
Senior Party
(Application 09/644,192).
Patent Interference No. 104,815
Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Senior party Weigl has expressly abandoned involved Application, 09/644,192. See Paper
22. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1,662(a), the abandonment of an involved application is treated as a
request for entry of an adverse judgment. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count I (Paperlp.5),is
awarded against the senior party, BERNHARD WEIGL, PAUL YAGER, JAMES BRODY and
MARK HOLL;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007