3
The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 27
Filed by: Interference Trial Section
Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed:
Washington, D.C. 20231 9 January 2003
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
FAXED
RICHARD R. ANDERSON
ýJAN 9 - 2003
Junior Party,
(Application 09/197,105), PAT. & TM. OFFICE
13OARD OF PATENT APPEALS
ANDINTERFERENCES
V.
BRUCE KLITZMAN and KIM E. KOGER
Senior Party,
(Patent 6,013,122).
Patent Interference No. 104,841
Before: SCHAFER, LEE and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judg .
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Anderson has filed a concession of priority as to the subject matter of Counts I and 2, the
sole counts in this interference. Paper 25. A concession of priority is treated as a request for entry
of adverse judgment. 37 CFR § 1,662(a). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Counts I and 2 (Paper 1,
p. 5), is awarded against the junior party, RICHARD R. ANDERSON;
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007