JACOBSEN et al. V. Fuller et al. - Page 2





                         ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count I (Paper 1, page 5), the sole count in                                
                 the interference, is awarded against junior party MARK W. FULLER, JOHN CANAVAN,                                             
                 JAMES DOYLE, KEITH KALIS and TERRY VAN BLARICOM.                                                                            
                         FURTHER ORDERED that junior party MARK W. FULLER, JOHN CANAVAN,                                                     
                 JAMES DOYLE, KEITH KALIS and TERRY VAN BLARICOM is not entitled to a patent                                                 
                 containing claims 2-22 (corresponding to Count I respectively) of application 09/649,110, filed                             
                 28 August 2000.                                                                                                             
                         FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of                                       
                 application 09/649,110 and U.S. Patent 6,053,423.                                                                           
                         FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to 35                                
                 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.                                                                                         



                                 SALLYNANE                                                                                                   
                                 Adminisfrative Patent Judge                                                                                 

                                                                                     BOARD OF PATENT                                         
                                                     -11,y APPEALS AND                                                                        
                                 Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES                                                                   


                                 MARKNAGUMO                                                                                                  
                                 Administrative Pat(6;udge                                                                                   






                                                                      2                                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007