Interference No. 105,020
Lee v. Silvestrini
Junior party has failed to file a response to the show cause order dated October 7, 2003.
Accordingly, it is now time appropriate to enterjudgment. It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Counts I and 2 is herein entered
against junior party JOSEPH Y. LEE;
FURTHER ORDER-ED that junior party JOSEPH Y. LEE is not entitled to claims 28,
30-33, and 35-37 of its Patent No. 5,733,334, claims 1-3 of its Patent No. 6,066,170, claims 18,
20, 21, 25 and 28 of its Patent No. 5,855,604, and claims 1-3, 5-7, 11, and 16-23 of its Patent
No. 5,876,439, all of which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOSEPH Y. LEE is not entitled to claims 1, 2
and 6 of its Patent No. 5,733,334, which correspond to Count 2;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007