Interference No. 105,034 Page No. 2 entered against Bansleben. 37 C.F.R. § 1.662. Upon consideration of the record, it is: ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Counts I and 2 (Notice Declaring Interference, Paper No. 1, page 6), the counts in the interference, is awarded against Junior Party Bansleben. FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Bansleben is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 11-26, 28, 31, 38, 46-63, 65, 67-69, 176-188, 189-222 of Bansleben et al., U.S. Patent Application 09/568,626 as these claims correspond to Counts 1 or 2. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a paper number in the file of Johnson et al., U.S. Application No. 09/417,323 and Bansleben et al., U.S. Patent Application 09/568,626. FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661. CAROL A. SiGe Administrative Patent Judge BOARD OF PATENT #SALYAGARD-NER- LANE APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge AND INTERFERENCES MICHAEL P. TIERNEY Administrative Patent JudgePage: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007