The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 18
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
US Patent and Trademark Office Filed:
P. 0. Box 1450 29 September 2003
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS FAXED
AND INTERFERENCES
SEP 2 9 2003
ILYA OKUN and ALEX OKUN,
Junior Party PAT. & T.M. OFFICE
BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
(Patent 5,919,646), AND INTERFERENCES
V.
JOHN WALLACE PARCE, ANNE R. KOPF-SILL
and LUC J. BOUSSE,
Senior Party
(Applications 09/608,898).
Patent Interference No. 105,042
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Senior party Parce has expressly abandoned involved Application, 09/608,898. See Paper
17. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of art involved application is treated as a
request for entry of an adverse judgment. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count I (Paperlp.5),is
awarded against the senior party, JOHN WALLACE PARCE, ANNE R. KOPF-SILL
and LUC J. BOUSSE;
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007