SHENG V. SHAO et al. - Page 2





                        FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, JIQUN SHAO and STUART DENHOLM, is                                                 
                not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-5, 8-15 and 17-19 (corresponding to Count 1) of                                 
                Patent 5,654,043;                                                                                                            
                        FURTHER ORDERED that the conference call scheduled for January 7, 2003, is                                           
                cancelled;                                                                                                                   
                        FURTHER ORDERED that if there be a settlement agreement, which has not been filed,                                   
                that the parties are advised of the requirement to file a copy of the agreement (35 U.S.C. §                                 
                135(c)); and                                                                                                                 
                        FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in Application                                        
                08/697,321 and in the file history of Patent 5,654,043.'                                                                     




                                        kiCHARDE.SCHAFER                                                                                     
                                        AdmiWistrative Patent Jud re                                                                         
                                                                                            BOARD OF PATENT                                  
                                        RICHARD TORCZON                                                                                      
                                        Administrative Patent Jud c APPEALS AND                                                              
                                                                                          )INTERFERENCES                                     
                                       'MARK NAGUMO                                                                                          
                                        Administrative Patent J e                                                                            








                        'Shao's request for adverse judgment states:                                                                         
                                Party Shao, expressly reserves its right of priority to all the remaining                                    
                                claims of U.S. Patent 5,654,043 not designated as corresponding to the                                       
                                count, i.e., claims 6, 7, 16, 20, and 21.                                                                    
                In entering judgment against Shao no consideration has been given to the above-quoted                                        
                statement.                                                                                                                   
                                                                     2                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007