STICE et al. V. Stice et al. - Page 2



                to be decided and UMass has not alleged a date of invention earlier than the Infigen's accorded                                      
                benefit date, we enter final judgment against UMass.                                                                                 
                                                            FINDINGS OF FACT                                                                         
                         The following findings of fact are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Additional                                 
                findings of fact may be present in the analysis section of this opinion.                                                             
                         The Parties                                                                                                                 
                F 1. This interference is between Patent 5,905,042 and Application 09/573,044.                                                       
                F 2. The real parties-in-interest of the 042 Patent is said to be the University of Massachusetts                                    
                         (UMass), and Advance Cell Technology, Inc., as the assignee and exclusive licensee,                                         
                         respectively. Paper 10.                                                                                                     
                F 3. The real party in interest of the 044 Application is said to Infigen, Inc. (Infigen) Paper 7.                                   
                F 4. The application which issued as the UMass patent was filed April 1, 1996.                                                       
                F 5. Infigen's involved application was filed May 15, 2000.                                                                          
                F 6. Infigen's involved application is said to be a continuation of Application 08/172,385.                                          
                F 7. When this interference was declared, Infigen was accorded the benefit of Application                                            
                         08/172,385, filed December 23, 1993. Paper 1, p. 4.                                                                         
                F 8. By virtue of the accorded date of December 23, 1993, Infigen is the senior party.                                               
                         The Subject Matter of the Interference                                                                                      
                F 9. The subject matter of the interference relates to methods for producing certain cultured                                        
                         ungulate cells.                                                                                                             
                F 10. The methods generally include the steps of obtaining inner cell mass or inner cell mass                                        
                         precursor cells, culturing the cells on a feeder layer to produce cell colonies, identifying cell                           
                         that have certain characteristics, separating the identified cells, and culturing the identified                            
                         and separated cells to form an ungulate embryo.                                                                             
                F 11. Claim I is representative of the parties' invention as claimed in the UMass patent:                                            
                                  1. A method for producing a bovine or porcine cultured inner cell mass                                             
                                  (CICM) cell                                                                                                        
                                          which may be incorporated into a bovine or porcine embryo to form                                          
                                          a chimeric bovine or porcine                                                                               
                                  which consists essentially of the following steps:                                                                 


                                                                       -2-                                                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007