Ex Parte HUYNH - Page 2




              Interference No. 105,074                                                                                        
              Hyunh v. Lindmark                                                                                               
                      On June 5, 2003, senior party Lindmark filed a paper entitled "Lindmark's Filing of                     
              Express Abandonment" (Paper No. 23) wherein it is stated: "Lindmark hereby files its Express                    
              Abandonment, attached hereto of the Lindmark application in interference."                                      
                      Per 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of the senior party's involved application is                    
              herein treated as a request for entry of adverse judgment against senior party Lindmark. The                    
              request is granted.                                                                                             
                      It is                                                                                                   
                      ORDER-ED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count is hereby entered against                  
              senior party BJORN LINDMARK;                                                                                    
                      FURTHER ORDER-ED that senior party BJORN LINDMARK is not entitled to its                                
              application claims 9-15 and 19-27 which correspond to the count; and                                            
                      FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note                        
              the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and                                                  
                      FURTHER ORDER-ED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective                               
              involved application or patent of the parties.                                                                  











                                                              2                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007