Interference 105,166 Paper 4
Becley v. Liu
A. Background
On 19 November 2003, Beeley filed "Beeley response to notice declaring interference," in
which Beeley stated, "In response to the Notice Declaring Interference dated November 4, 2003,
notice is hereby provided by the Party Beeley that it will not contest or enter any appearance or
evidence in the above identified interference." (Paper 3 at 2.)
This notice is accepted as a request for adverse judgment.
B. Order
In view of Beeley's request for adverse judgment, it is:
ORDERED that judgment is entered against j unior party LEE JAMES BEELEY, KELLY
PAINE, and ROBERT JAMES GODDEN. 37 CFR § 1.662.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count I (paper I at 5) is awarded
against junior party LEE JAMES BEELEY, KELLY PAINE, and ROBERT JAMES GODDEN.
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party LEE JAMES BEELEY, KELLY PAINE, and
ROBERT JAMES GODDEN is not entitled to a patent containing claims 10-12 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,187,560. 35 U.S.C. § 102(g).
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this shall be made of record in the application file
of Beeley patent 6,187,560 and Liu application 09/081,737.
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007