Appeal No. 2003-0420 Παγε 2 Application No. 09/533,904 BACKGROUND 1. A review of the file record indicates that claims 47 to 53 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 251 as attempting to recapture subject matter surrendered in the application to obtain the original patent. 2. A precedential opinion concerning a reissue recapture rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 251 was decided May 29, 2003 in Ex parte Eggert.2 In Eggert, the majority opinion applied the fact-specific analysis set forth in In re Clement, 131 F.3d 1464, 1468-71 45 USPQ2d 1161, 1164-66 (Fed. Cir. 1997), determined that under the facts and circumstances before it, the “surrendered subject matter” was claim 1 of Eggert as that claim existed prior to the post-final rejection amendment that led to the allowance of claim 1 in the original patent, and decided that reissue claims 15-22 of Eggert were not precluded (i.e., barred) by the “recapture rule.” Slip. op. at 39-45. ACTION We remand this application to the examiner for a determination of whether the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 251 remains appropriate in view of Ex parte Eggert. 2 A copy of the Eggert opinion is attached to this opinion. An electronic copy of Eggert is available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/prec/RC010790.pdf.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007