Appeal No. 1996-3356 Application No. 08/235,668 Reference Relied Upon by the Examiner Hartford et al. (Hartford) 4,255,789 Mar. 10, 1981 Claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hartford. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the Examiner and the appellants, we make reference to the briefs1 and answer2 for the details thereto. OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to the appellants' specification and claims, to the applied prior art reference, and to the respective positions articulated by appellants and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations which follow. Here, we note that the examiner has latched onto a number of teachings in Hartford that the sampling frequency or interval of each of the sensors of each individual control components may be independently controlled or adjusted by the computer control 1 Appellants filed an appeal brief, December 18, 1995, (Paper No. 14). We will refer to this appeal brief as simply the brief. Appellants filed an reply brief, June 10, 1996, (Paper No. 16). We will refer to this appeal brief as simply the reply. Appellants filed a reply to the examiner’s response to the Remand on October 24, 2001, (Paper No. 20). We will refer to this reply as the response. 2 The Examiner responded to the brief with an Examiner's Answer mailed April 5, 1996, (Paper No. 15). We will refer to this examiner's answer as simply the answer. The reply brief was noted in a paper mailed July 30, 1996, (Paper No. 17) indicating that no further response was required. The Examiner responded to the first Remand with an letter mailed September 28, 2001, (Paper No. 19). We will refer to this examiner's letter as simply the letter. The Examiner responded to the second Remand with a Supplemental Examiner's Answer mailed January 14, 2003, (Paper No. 22). We will refer to this supplemental examiner's answer as simply the supplemental answer -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007