The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte AKIRA TANAKA and MASAMICHI HOSHI ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0549 Application No. 08/661,711 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 10. Claims 3-7 and 11 have been withdrawn by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected species of the invention, and claims 8 and 9 have been canceled. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007