Interference No. 105,001
Page No. 2
1. Michael P. Tierney, Administrative Patent Judge (“APJ”).
2. Mark D. Lorusso, counsel for Rey.
3. Jeffrey S. Ward, lead counsel for Jackson.
4. Thomas J. Kowalski, lead counsel for Stampa.
Part B. Relevant Discussion During Conference Call
Junior Party Rey requested adverse judgment as to all claims corresponding to Count 1
(claims 22-31), the sole count in interference. (Paper Nos. 1 and 26). As Rey has requested
adverse judgment as to the count and corresponding claims involved in the interference,
judgment on priority is awarded against Rey.
Upon consideration of the record, it is:
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 is awarded against Junior Party Rey.
FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Rey is not entitled to a patent containing
claims 22-31, which correspond to Count 1.
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a
paper number in the file of Rey U.S. Application 09/380,835 and Stampa, U.S. Patent No.
6,084,100 and Stampa Reissue Application No. 10/234,659.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007