Holbrooks v. bacchi et al - Page 5




               Interference No. 105,028                                                                                          

                      Bacchi’s Motion 3 is granted because Holbrooks has no written description under                            
               35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, of a pad portion for supporting the peripheral edge of a                        
               specimen or a wafer.  It is apparent that Bacchi has established that Holbrooks’ specification                    
               does not set forth the language of the claims in identical or substantially identical words.  Bacchi              
               has also shown that the drawings do not illustrate structure that specifically meets the language                 
               of the claims.  However, this alone is not fatal to Holbrooks because the written description                     
               requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112 asks no more than whether the disclosure as originally filed                       
               would reasonably convey to an ordinary artisan that the inventor was in possession of the                         
               claimed subject matter.  Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar Co., Inc., 772 F.2d 1570, 1575,                            
               227 USPQ 177, 179 (Fed Cir. 1985).  Nevertheless, we find that Holbrooks’ disclosure does not                     
               satisfy this requirement.                                                                                         
                      The junior party’s position that the profile of its finger 105 or 205 and the post 103 and                 
               203, with a wafer being held, would look as shown in Attachment B to its opposition has not                       
               been shown to have any basis in fact in its original disclosure.  Holbrooks has not shown how its                 
               disclosure describes or illustrates a finger or post with 1) an upper portion narrower than the                   
               lower portion or 2) a wedge-shaped space of sufficient size to permit a wafer to be supported on                  
               the lower surface (rest pad) of the groove defining the wedge-shaped space.  Holbrooks has not                    
               directed our attention to any part of its disclosure that would reasonably convey to an ordinary                  
               artisan that it was in possession of the subject matter illustrated in its Attachment B.                          
                      We agree with Bacchi that Holbrooks’ surface 42 does not inherently support a wafer.  A                    
               reasonably depicted side view of a finger or post as disclosed by Holbrooks in Figure 2b is                       
               illustrated at page 8, and again at page 11, of Bacchi’s Motion 3.  As shown in Holbrooks’                        

                                                               -5-                                                               



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007