was made,
subject to an obligation of assignment to Sibner, it is now time appropriate to enter judgment
against the junior party Sibner.
B. Findings of fact
1. The interference was declared on October 25, 2002 (Paper 1).
2. Sibner is involved on the basis of Patent 5,766,011, granted 16 June 1998, based on
application 08/757,248, filed 27 November 1996.
3. Sibner is also involved on the basis of application 09/114,166, filed 13 July 1998.
4. Sibner has been accorded benefit for the purpose of priority for the ‘166 application of
the involved patented file, 08/757,248.
5. Gilbert is involved on the basis of application 08/955,005, filed 20 October 1997.
6. Gilbert has been accorded benefit for the purpose of priority of provisional application
60/029,504, filed 29 October 1996.
7. Count 1, the sole count of the interference, is as follows:
Claim 1 of Sibner’s Patent 5,766,011
or
Claim 1 of Sibner’s Application 09/114,166
or
Claim 23 of Gilbert’s Application 08/955,005
8. The claims of the parties are:
Sibner (5,766,011): 1-21
Sibner (09/114,166): 1-34
Gilbert: 1-3, 5-16 and 18-23
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007