MAIL STOP INTERFERENCE Paper 26 ALEXANDRIA VA 22313-1450 703-308-9797 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 703-305-0942 (fax) BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (09/032,086), Junior Party, v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE GmbH and BAYER BIOSCIENCE N.V. (09/147,993), Senior Party. Interference No. 105,041 Before LEE, TORCZON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. DECISION ON MOTIONS and JUDGMENT (PURSUANT TO 37 CFR §§ 1.640 and 1.662(a)) INTRODUCTION The parties have moved jointly to have certain Syngenta claims designated as not corresponding to the count (Paper 20). Contingent on the grant of that motion, Syngenta has requested adverse judgment under 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(a) (Paper 22). The motion is granted and consequently judgment is entered. FACT FINDINGS [1] The parties would like claims 43-51, 56, 94-102, and 107 of the Syngenta application to be redesignated as not corresponding to the count (Paper 20 at 2).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007