JUDGMENT
Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion for no interference-in-fact it is
ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion for no interference-in-fact is granted.
FURTHER ORDERED that there is no interference-in-fact between Claims 9-14 of Stiller
Application 09/101,663 and Claims 1-3, 18, 20, 24-26, 30-32 of Heid Patent 5,895,628;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of both parties;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not been filed,
attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed in the files of
Stiller Application 09/101,663 and Heid Patent 5,895,628.
)
______________________________)
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
______________________________) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMESON LEE ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
______________________________)
RICHARD TORCZON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 7 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007