Interference No. 105,045
Page No. 2
Additionally, it is noted that the Board has received a copy of “Bandman’s Filing of
Agreements Under 35 U.S.C. §135(c).” (Paper No. 18).
Upon consideration of the record, it is:
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Counts 1 and 2, the counts in the interference,
is awarded against Bandman.
FURTHER ORDERED that Bandman is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-2
of Bandman, U.S. Patent No. 5,958,699 as they correspond to Count 1.
FURTHER ORDERED that Bandman is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-4
of Bandman, U.S. Patent No. 5,958,699 as they correspond to Count 2.
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a
paper number in the file of Bandman, U.S. Patent No. 5,958,699 and Kato et al., U.S.
Application No. 09/671,483.
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007