USUI v. MCCORMICK et al - Page 2




                Interference No. 105,065                                                                       Paper 10                  
                Usui v. McCormick                                                                                Page 2                  
                                                               ORDER                                                                     
                        Upon consideration of Usui's request for adverse judgment, it is—                                                
                        ORDERED that Usui's request for adverse judgment be GRANTED;                                                     
                        FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 be awarded against junior                                
                party Usui;                                                                                                              
                        FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Usui not be granted to a patent containing the                                 
                subject matter of claims 28, 30-35, 43, and 44 of Usui's 08/817,101 application, which                                   
                correspond to Count 1; and                                                                                               
                        FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be given a paper number and be                                      
                entered in the administrative record of Usui's 08/817,101 and McCormick's 08/724,631                                     
                application.                                                                                                             



                                                     RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                                                  
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                                         
                                                                                                BOARD OF PATENT                          
                                                                                                   APPEALS AND                           
                                                     RICHARD TORCZON                              INTERFERENCES                          
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                                         
                                                                                                  INTERFERENCE                           
                                                                                                  TRIAL SECTION                          
                                                     MICHAEL P. TIERNEY                                                                  
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                                         




                Notice:  Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral agreements        
                referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of the interference, shall be in writing
                and a true copy thereof filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office before termination of the interference as 
                between said parties to the agreement or understanding.  35 U.S.C. 135(c); 37 C.F.R. § 1.661.                            


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007