The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 19
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
U.S Patent and Trademark Office Filed:
P. O. Box 1450 29 September 2003
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
ILYA OKUN and ALEX OKUN
Junior Party,
(Patents 5,804,436 and 5,919,646),
v.
JOHN WALLACE PARCE, ANNE R. KOPF-SILL
and LUC J. BOUSSE,
Senior Party
(Applications 09/250,029 and 10/084,635).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 105,070
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Senior party Parce has expressly abandoned involved Applications 09/250,029 and
10/084,635. See Paper 18. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of an involved
application is treated as a request for entry of an adverse judgment. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 5), is
awarded against the senior party, JOHN WALLACE PARCE, ANNE R. KOPF-SILL and LUC J.
BOUSSE;
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007