Appeal No. 2001-0546
Application 07/842,722
(D7-10). Appellants state that the limitation "is being viewed
too narrowly in the new ground of rejection (RR2); however,
appellants fail to point out where the limitation is described in
the specification, whether it is viewed narrowly or broadly.
Appellants have not particularly said what the error is in our
decision so that we may address the perceived problem.
We have reconsidered our decision in light of appellants'
arguments. We are not persuaded of any errors in our opinion,
nor have appellants really pointed to any. Accordingly, the
request for rehearing is DENIED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
DENIED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007