Appeal No. 2001-1371 Application No. 09/120,712 disclaimer in an attempt to obviate the obviousness-type double patenting rejection. While a timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR § 1.321(c) may be effective in overcoming an obviousness-type double patenting rejection, the review of the appropriateness of any such terminal disclaimer lies within the jurisdiction of the Examiner. In response to Appellants’ request, we have reviewed our original decision and find no errors therein, nor, as discussed above, have Appellants alleged any errors exist. Accordingly, we have granted Appellants’ request to the extent that we have reconsidered our decision of July 31, 2003, but we deny the request with respect to making any changes therein. REMAND TO THE EXAMINER As discussed supra, Appellants have included a terminal disclaimer in their request for rehearing of the Board decision of July 31, 2003. We hereby remand this application to the Examiner for consideration of the terminal disclaimer and to take any other appropriate action as necessary. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007