Ex Parte MEHRAD et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1371                                                        
          Application No. 09/120,712                                                  


          disclaimer in an attempt to obviate the obviousness-type double             
          patenting rejection.  While a timely filed terminal disclaimer in           
          compliance with 37 CFR § 1.321(c) may be effective in overcoming            
          an obviousness-type double patenting rejection, the review of the           
          appropriateness of any such terminal disclaimer lies within the             
          jurisdiction of the Examiner.                                               
               In response to Appellants’ request, we have reviewed our               
          original decision and find no errors therein, nor, as discussed             
          above, have Appellants alleged any errors exist.  Accordingly, we           
          have granted Appellants’ request to the extent that we have                 
          reconsidered our decision of July 31, 2003, but we deny the                 
          request with respect to making any changes therein.                         
                               REMAND TO THE EXAMINER                                 
               As discussed supra, Appellants have included a terminal                
          disclaimer in their request for rehearing of the Board decision             
          of July 31, 2003.  We hereby remand this application to the                 
          Examiner for consideration of the terminal disclaimer and to take           
          any other appropriate action as necessary.                                  







                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007