The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PETER VAN DE WITTE,
JOHANNES A.M.M. VAN HAAREN,
RIFAT A.M. HIKMET,
and
DIRK J. BROER
_____________
Appeal No. 2002-0122
Application No. 08/857,756
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to a request, filed August 12, 2003, for
rehearing of our decision, mailed June 26, 2003, wherein we
affirmed the examiner’s Section 103 rejections of all appealed
claims.
As correctly indicated in the request, in our above noted
decision, we affirmed the examiner’s rejection based on each of
the two claim interpretations discussed in the answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007