Appeal No. 2002-1201 Application No. 09/026,575 discharging a charge through the substrate holder does not address the thrust of the examiner's rejection. It is the examiner's position that substrate holder 12 of Tateishi also functions as a shadow frame. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, appellants' request is denied with respect to making any change in our decision affirming the examiner's rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). DENIED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007