The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LESTER CORNELIUS
___________
Appeal No. 2003-0757
Application No. 09/849,884
__________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant has submitted a Request for Rehearing dated July
22, 2003, Paper No. 21 (hereafter the “Request”). Appellant
requests a rehearing under 37 CFR § 1.197(b) of our decision
dated June 26, 2003, Paper No. 20 (hereafter the “Decision”). In
the Decision, we affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 9
through 13, the only claims remaining in this application, under
the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112, “as containing subject
matter which was not described in the specification in such a way
as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007