Ex Parte SACHDEV et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was          
              not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.          

                                                             Paper No. 29             

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                    Ex parte  KRISHNA G. SACHDEV, UMAR M. AHMAD,                      
                          FAREED Y. AUDI, DANIEL G. BERGER,                           
                       JOHN U. KNICKERBOCKER, and CHON C. LEI                         
                                                                                     
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2003-0955                                  
                             Application No. 09/406,645                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      


          Before KIMLIN, PAWLIKOWSKI and MOORE, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                 

               Pursuant to the provisions 37 CFR § 1.197(b) (amended                  
          December 1, 1997), appellants have submitted a Request for                  
          Rehearing (hereafter “Request”) of our decision dated May 29,               
          2003, reversing the 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph rejection,             
          but affirming the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-            
          7.                                                                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007