The opinion in support of the errata being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KATHLEEN RYALL,
JOSEPH MARKS
and STUART MERRILL SHIEBER
__________
Appeal No. 2001-0670
Application No. 08/932,725
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before GROSS, LEVY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
ERRATA
Upon further review of our Decision, mailed December 12,
2003, we find that an obvious oversight occurred on page 22. The
rejection of claims 15 and 16 should have been reversed due to
their dependency from claim 13. Accordingly, the rejection of
claims 15 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. The
remainder of the Decision stands unchanged.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007