Ex Parte UEDA - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2001-2013                                                                      
            Application No. 08/869,592                                                                


                  10. Apparatus for processing a signal, comprising:                                  
                  a plurality of signal processing circuits, which are                                
            sequentially connected;                                                                   
                  at least a first of said plurality of signal processing                             
            circuits including means for dividing and shuffling an input                              
            signal into predetermined units;                                                          
                  at least a second of said plurality of signal processing                            
            circuits including means for adding header information which                              
            includes timing data and shuffling data to each of said                                   
            predetermined units of said input signal; and                                             
                  wherein signal processing circuits succeeding said at least                         
            a second of said plurality of signal processing circuits perform                          
            predetermined signal processing on said predetermined units of                            
            said input signal in accordance with said timing data and said                            
            shuffling data included in said header information contained                              
            therein without regard to processing delays of said signal                                
            processing circuits to generate units of data.                                            
                  The prior art references of record relied upon by the                               
            examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                            
            Gonzales et al. (Gonzales)          5,289,577               Feb. 22, 1994                 
            Smidth et al. (Smidth)              5,301,018               Apr. 05, 1994                 
                                                (effectively filed Feb. 13, 1991)                     
            Siracusa                            5,483,287               Jan. 09, 1996                 
                                                (effectively filed Jun. 19, 1992)                     
                  Claims 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                         
            being anticipated by Smidth.                                                              
                  Claims 3 through 5, 10, and 11 stand rejected under                                 
            35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gonzales in view of                            
            Siracusa and Smidth.                                                                      
                  Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 21,                           
            mailed September 25, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning                          
            in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No.                         
                                                  2                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007