Appeal No. 2001-2013 Application No. 08/869,592 10. Apparatus for processing a signal, comprising: a plurality of signal processing circuits, which are sequentially connected; at least a first of said plurality of signal processing circuits including means for dividing and shuffling an input signal into predetermined units; at least a second of said plurality of signal processing circuits including means for adding header information which includes timing data and shuffling data to each of said predetermined units of said input signal; and wherein signal processing circuits succeeding said at least a second of said plurality of signal processing circuits perform predetermined signal processing on said predetermined units of said input signal in accordance with said timing data and said shuffling data included in said header information contained therein without regard to processing delays of said signal processing circuits to generate units of data. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Gonzales et al. (Gonzales) 5,289,577 Feb. 22, 1994 Smidth et al. (Smidth) 5,301,018 Apr. 05, 1994 (effectively filed Feb. 13, 1991) Siracusa 5,483,287 Jan. 09, 1996 (effectively filed Jun. 19, 1992) Claims 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Smidth. Claims 3 through 5, 10, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gonzales in view of Siracusa and Smidth. Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 21, mailed September 25, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007