Ex Parte FRANASZEK et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                             Paper No. 26             

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                         Ex parte PETER ANTHONY FRANASZEK,                            
                            MICHEL HENRI THEODORE HACK,                               
                                CHARLES OTTO SCHULZ,                                  
                             and THOMAS BASIL SMITH III                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-0058                                  
                               Application 08/859,865                                 
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
            Before JERRY SMITH, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent               
            Judges.                                                                   
            JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                 This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134               
            from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-34, which                       
            constitute all the claims in the application.                             
                 The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                     
            apparatus for managing memory in a computer.                              



                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007