The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREW MAX NUXOLL, GORDON SCOTT RULONG,
and DOUGLAS ANDREW WOOD
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0275
Application No. 09/215,752
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GROSS, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-7, 10-14, 16, 18-20, 22, and 24-47, which are all the claims
remaining in the application.
We affirm-in-part.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007