The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANTHONY M. RADICE
__________
Appeal No. 2002-0763
Application No. 09/039,111
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 10.
The disclosed invention relates to a coder for forming a
composite video signal from a plurality of N separate video
sources.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it
reads as follows:
1. A coder for forming a composite video signal from a
plurality of N separate video sources, the coder comprising
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007