The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
______________________
Ex parte LAUREN LEE POST, MICHAEL JOSEPH KOVAL
AND DARRYL RAY POLK
______________________
Appeal No. 2002-0769
Application No. 08/822,319
______________________
ON BRIEF
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 5, 12, 13, 17 through 19, 22
through 24, 27, 28, 35, 36 and 40 through 53. Claims 6 through 11, 14 through 16, 29 through
34 and 37 through 39 have been allowed.
The disclosed invention relates to the synchronization of audio data and video data in a
data stream.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007