Appeal No. 2002-0870 Page 6 Application No. 09/208,206 In our view, the reasons cited in support of the examiner’s rejection are insufficient to support the examiner’s conclusion that the claims are not enabled by the specification (Answer, page 3). Accordingly, the rejection of claims 6 and 23 under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed. REVERSED ) William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) Toni R. Scheiner ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007