THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHANG-HUN OH
_____________
Appeal No. 2002-0992
Application 09/116,018
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-17, which constitute all the claims in the application. The examiner
has since withdrawn the rejection with respect to claims 13-15 and 17. Therefore, this
appeal is directed to the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-12 and 16.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for use in a Code
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007