Appeal No. 2002-1044
Application No. 09/017,096
For the rejection of the dependent claims 12, 13, 15, 21, 22, 24 and 25 under 35
U.S.C. § 103, we note that the Examiner relies on Des Jardins for the above limitations
of these rejections as well. Furthermore, we fail to find that the cited art supplies this
missing piece. Therefore, we will not sustain these rejections for the same reasons as
stated above.
In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the Examiner’s rejections of
claims 10-13, 15, 20-22, 24 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF/vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007