Appeal No. 2002-1153
Application No. 09/063,720
Turning to the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 8-25 over
Dent and Cisneros, we note that each of the independent claims 8
and 15, similar to claims 20-25, recites using a coarse position
by a GPS to determine an accurate position of the mobile
terminal. The Examiner, in relying on Dent, has not provided any
additional factual evidence to overcome the deficiencies of
Cisneros above with respect to the rejection of claims 20-25, and
therefore, has failed to establish a prima facie case of
obviousness. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 8-25 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 over Dent and Cisneros is not sustained.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007