Appeal No. 2002-1157 Application No. 08/901,940 using solder balls 80 (brief, pages 9 & 10). However, the focus of the Examiner’s response to Appellants’ arguments is that Ainslie discloses a dummy thin-film pattern, such as extension pattern 49, in a slider-mounting portion (answer, page 11). Ainslie relates to a method for attaching a slider to a suspension, which is attached to a support arm of the head positioning actuator (col. 1, lines 15-28). Ainslie provides for a pattern of solder contact pads on the back side of the slider and a similar pattern on the planar portion of the suspension to which the slider is to be attached (col. 2, lines 46-50. Ainslie further teaches that because the orientation of the slider with respect to the suspension is determined by the pattern of the solder contact pads, the slider can be reliably positioned on the suspension by merely orienting the solder contact pads (col. 3, lines 51-55). As depicted in Figures 2 and 3, Ainslie mechanically bonds slider 16 to the large area portions 52 and 54 of conductive pattern 44 by reflowed solder balls 60 between the slider back 24 and the conductive layer 44 (col. 5, lines 50-53). We further note that the portion of the reference relied on by the Examiner (col. 5, lines 57-59) merely refers to extensions 49 of portion 52 as the areas onto which the inactive transducer 13 are connected and has nothing to do with the claimed dummy 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007