Ex Parte ROMESBURG - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-1197                                                        
          Application 09/131,167                                                      

               Claim 17 is reproduced below.                                          
               17.  A communications device, comprising:                              
                    an adaptive system configured to estimate a component             
               of a source signal,                                                    
                    wherein variables of said adaptive system are updated             
               only when a prevailing value of the source signal is within            
               a predetermined range of possible source signal values.                

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
               Haneda et al. (Haneda)   5,721,772    February 24, 1998                
               Koski                    6,192,126    February 20, 2001                
          (filed May 28, 1998)                                                        

               Claims 1-41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being           
          unpatentable over Koski and Haneda.  The examiner finds that                
          Koski discloses the claimed subject matter except for the echo              
          estimate.  The examiner finds that Haneda teaches providing an              
          echo estimate.  The examiner concludes that it would have been              
          obvious to modify Koski to provide an echo estimate, in view of             
          the teachings of Haneda, to allow the echo component of the                 
          source signal to be subtracted out.                                         
               We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 12) (pages                  
          referred to as "FR__") and the examiner's answer (Paper No. 18)             
          (pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the examiner's             
          rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 17) (pages referred to as            
          "Br__") and reply brief (Paper No. 20) (pages referred to as                
          "RBr__") for a statement of appellant's arguments thereagainst.             


                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007