Ex Parte SHINOHARA et al - Page 1





                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for              
                                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
              Paper No. 31                                                                                              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                   Ex parte KOJI SHINOHARA and KOKI HAMADA                                              
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2002-1236                                                   
                                               Application No. 08/359,743                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before DIXON, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
              DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1,3-6, 8,               
              9, 13-22, 31 and 32.  The examiner has indicated that claims 13-30 are now allowable.                     
              Therefore, we limit our review to claims 1,3-6, 8, 9, 31, and 32.                                         


                     We AFFIRM.                                                                                         











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007