Appeal No. 2002-1301
Application No. 09/233,983
We will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 21,
for essentially the reasons argued by appellant in the brief. We
agree with appellant that there is no suggestion in either
reference of measuring the slew rate of the transducer unit for
reasons discussed above.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the
examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Accordingly, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-14 and 20-24 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS:svt
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007