Appeal No. 2002-1309 Page 7 Application No. 09/286,760 Since the teachings of Singhal do not render any of the independent claims obvious, they also fail to teach the obviousness of any of the dependent claims as well. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-21 is reversed. REVERSED ) Jerry Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Joseph L. Dixon ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Stuart S. Levy ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/eldPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007