Ex Parte SMITH et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-1327                                                        
          Application 09/218,247                                                      

          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus for connecting a wireless handset to a wireline switch            
          in an integrated wireline/wireless telecommunication network.               
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.   A method for connecting a wireless handset to a                   
          wireline switch in an integrated wireline/wireless                          
          telecommunications network having a plurality of access                     
          controllers and wireline switches, each of the access controllers           
          being coupled to at least one of the wireline switches, the                 
          method comprising:                                                          
               receiving identification of a subscriber in response to a              
          call attempt;                                                               
               determining a preferred connection between the wireless                
          handset and one of the plurality of wireline switches based on              
          predetermined data associated with the subscriber; and                      
               connecting the wireless handset to one of the plurality of             
          wireline switches based on the preferred connection so as to                
          complete the call attempt.                                                  
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Sato et al. (Sato)            6,088,597          July 11, 2000              
          (filed Dec. 20, 1996)                                                       
          Claims 1, 2, 4-8 and 10-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Sato.  Claims            
          3 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                    
          unpatentable over the teachings of Sato taken alone.                        



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007