Ex Parte VOGELEISEN - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2002-1328                                                        
          Application 08/970,883                                                      

          which the depression of a single emergency key dials a pre-stored           
          telephone number, activates the speaker and microphone of a                 
          personal device and activates the speaker of a base unit.  The              
          examiner has found a first reference which teaches that a single            
          key can cause a pre-stored telephone number to be dialed, a                 
          second reference which teaches that a single key can cause the              
          speaker and microphone of a personal device to be activated, and            
          a third reference which teaches that a single key can cause the             
          speaker of the base unit to be activated.  Although the applied             
          prior art teaches that the three functions of the claims can each           
          be individually activated by depression of a single key, there is           
          no teaching or suggestion of using a single emergency key to                
          activate all three functions.  Appellant’s disclosure explains              
          the need for activating the three functions at the same time in             
          an expeditious manner using a single emergency key.  The applied            
          prior art does not recognize the need for the claimed three                 
          functions to be activated at the same time.  Since the need is              
          not recognized, the applied prior art makes no suggestion that              
          the same key should be used to activate all three functions in              
          the event of an emergency.  The only suggestion to use a single             
          emergency key to activate all three functions at the same time              
          comes from appellant’s specification.  The examiner has provided            
                                         -7-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007