Appeal No. 2002-1531
Application No. 08/828,548
of the evidence of record and the teachings of prior art which are required in order to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness. The examiner relies upon the same
deficient teachings in White which Henley and Iwami do not remedy. Accordingly, we
do not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent claims 19 and 21 and
dependent claims 9, 10, and 18 over White and Henley or White and Iwami.
CONCLUSION
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007