The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ALI IBRAHIM FATTOM, RAMESH K SOOD, and SARA E. SHEPHERD __________ Appeal No. 2002-1545 Application No. 08/949,757 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, MILLS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6, 27, 31-39 and 42.1 Claims 1 and 36 are representative of the subject matter on appeal, and read as follows: 1. An isolated Enterococcus faecalis antigen comprising 2-acetamido-2- deoxy-glucose, rhamnose, glucose and 2-acetamido-2-deoxy- 1 Note that the claims were subject to an election of species, and the claims were examined to the extent they read on the species drawn to am Enterococcus faecalis antigen comprising rhamnose and acetamido-deoxyglucose in a 1:2 molar ratio. See Paper No. 13. Thus, this opinion reaches only the elected species.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007